Understand the software you own
1ADK vs Miro
1ADK gives owners concrete facts for developer conversations: what’s in the project, what changed during the sprint, and which questions still need answers.
Explore the components and connections found during analysis.Check the source reference behind a finding about a component.See new components and connections when comparing analyses.
Bring a map of the changes to your next review.
When the screens don’t change, a demo tells you little about the team’s work. 1ADK shows the project’s internal structure and differences between analyses. You can discuss a specific component, its connections, and the evidence behind each finding—and return to that record after the meeting.
01
What you gain with 1ADK
Show work beyond the interface
A new queue, integration, or background job appears on the map. Clients can see which part of the system changed even when the buttons and screens look the same.
Separate findings from assumptions
Finding a handler is one thing. Establishing how it handles errors is another. An unanswered question stays visible, so “it’s done” doesn’t end the conversation.
Pick up where you left off
Compare the next analysis with the previous one. The system picture and open questions stay with the project, independent of meeting notes or team changes.
02
Turn the map into a useful conversation
Example
A developer improved checkout behind the scenes
Suppose receipt delivery was moved to a background job. Checkout looks the same to customers, and the owner wants to know what the sprint delivered.
What 1ADK shows
The comparison shows a new queue and receipt worker. The map connects them to checkout. If retry behavior hasn’t been established, it remains a question for the developer.
The owner can see the internal changes and discuss the next step: how will the customer receive a receipt if the email service is unavailable?
03
What changes in your workflow
| Task | 1ADK | Miro |
|---|---|---|
| Discussion material | Components, interfaces, and connections found during project analysis. | Diagrams, notes, documents, and ideas on a shared board. |
| Supporting evidence | Source references and confirmation status are attached to findings. | Links and explanations can be added to the board. |
| Sprint results | Analysis comparisons show changes in the system picture. | Before-and-after views can be presented on the board; connecting them to system history is a separate step. |
| Open questions | Kept as part of the project’s knowledge. | Organized through board objects and the team’s working conventions. |
04
Using 1ADK and Miro together
Use 1ADK to prepare the facts and Miro to discuss decisions, alternatives, and next steps together. The board supports manual drawing, imported material, and AI-generated diagrams. The underlying findings and analysis history stay in 1ADK.
Questions about using 1ADK
To ground the diagram in findings from your project. 1ADK connects components to supporting references and keeps track of questions a picture alone can’t answer.
Yes. Compare analyses from before and after the work, open the changed components, and discuss outstanding questions. This complements the UI demo, especially for internal changes.
No. The board remains your collaboration space. 1ADK adds a technical record you can use before, during, and after the meeting.
Product names and trademarks belong to their owners. 1ADK is not affiliated with these companies.
Find out what’s in your project.
The first analysis and one update are free. Your coding agent examines the project; 1ADK receives a structured description, not source files. Explore the map, check the evidence, and compare results.
No repository access. No source-code upload. No card.