Understand the software you own
1ADK vs CodeScene
1ADK helps owners understand what they’re managing: the parts of the product, how they interact, and what the team changed. You don’t need to interpret code-quality metrics to discuss the system.
Explore the components and connections found during analysis.Check the source reference behind a finding about a component.See new components and connections when comparing analyses.
Discuss the product at the system level.
Code-quality measurements matter to developers. Owners also need answers about the product: what payments depend on, where data goes, and what appeared after a sprint. 1ADK organizes that information into a map with evidence and history, so you can ask precise questions and check the team’s explanations.
01
What you gain with 1ADK
Understand what a critical process depends on
Explore the discovered connections between payments, queues, databases, and external services. Discuss changes in the context of the product.
Make the team’s work visible
Compare two analyses to see added components, changed connections, and clarified details. Sprint discussions become specific.
Reduce reliance on one specialist
The map, supporting references, and questions stay in the project. A new tech lead gets a starting point, while the owner keeps access to what has been learned.
02
Turn the map into a useful conversation
Example
The payment subsystem changes every sprint
Suppose the owner keeps hearing that billing is complicated, but doesn’t know what it depends on or what is actually changing.
What 1ADK shows
The map shows discovered connections to a queue and payment providers. An unexplained legacy export stays an open question. The next analysis reveals which components and connections changed.
The owner can discuss a specific area: “Why do we need this export? What changed in payment handling, and what supports that conclusion?”
03
What changes in your workflow
| Task | 1ADK | CodeScene |
|---|---|---|
| Main question | How does my product work, what supports the findings, and what changed? | Which areas of code need attention to improve maintainability? |
| Main result | A system map, interfaces, evidence, open questions, and history. | Code-quality assessments, frequently changed complex areas, and team insights. |
| Preparing for a discussion | Open a relevant part of the system and follow a finding to its source reference. | Review measurements and priorities for technical improvement. |
| Working with source code | Your agent reads the code; the 1ADK service receives structured findings. | Analysis uses code and version-control history in the chosen deployment setup. |
04
Using 1ADK and CodeScene together
1ADK helps you understand the system and select an area to discuss. If you also need to assess the maintainability of its code, add CodeScene analysis. The map and its evidence complement code-quality measurements: owners get context, and engineers get input for technical improvements.
Questions about using 1ADK
To give the owner an accessible picture of the product: components, connections, supporting references, and open questions. Code-quality measurements and system knowledge answer different questions.
No. It helps you understand the system and check the evidence behind technical explanations. You can add maintainability analysis with another tool while using the 1ADK map for context.
The new team gets the accumulated system information and questions. A developer can check the source references, while the owner can continue the discussion and compare the next analysis with the previous one.
Product names and trademarks belong to their owners. 1ADK is not affiliated with these companies.
Find out what’s in your project.
The first analysis and one update are free. Your coding agent examines the project; 1ADK receives a structured description, not source files. Explore the map, check the evidence, and compare results.
No repository access. No source-code upload. No card.