Understand the software you own
1ADK vs Eraser
1ADK turns your coding agent’s findings into a system picture you can return to after the next sprint—with a map, supporting evidence, and a comparison of what changed.
Explore the components and connections found during analysis.Check the source reference behind a finding about a component.See new components and connections when comparing analyses.
Make the analysis useful beyond one conversation.
A diagram helps explain a decision. Owners also need to know what was implemented, which findings they can check, and what changed later. In 1ADK, findings are connected to the project’s components and interfaces, and each new analysis builds on its history.
01
What you gain with 1ADK
Keep the agent’s findings in one project
Components, interfaces, and connections become part of a shared system map. You can return to a finding without rereading a long agent response or hunting for a document version.
Review the implementation after development
Compare analyses from before and after the work. A new integration, handler, or connection appears in the system picture with its available supporting references.
Keep unanswered questions visible
If error behavior wasn’t established, the question stays alongside the findings. You can focus the next investigation on that area.
02
Turn the map into a useful conversation
Example
An agent added payment notification handling
Suppose a payment provider sends a notification when a payment completes. The team added a handler, and the owner wants to understand the result.
What 1ADK shows
The analysis finds the receiving endpoint, the handler, and the database write. The comparison shows the new interfaces. If duplicate handling hasn’t been established, it becomes a question for the next review.
Instead of accepting “the integration is done,” the owner can discuss a specific case: what happens if the provider sends the same notification twice?
03
What changes in your workflow
| Task | 1ADK | Eraser |
|---|---|---|
| Main result | A connected project picture: map, inventories, evidence, questions, and history. | Technical documents and editable diagrams. |
| AI’s role | Your coding agent examines the project; 1ADK organizes the submitted findings. | AI helps create diagrams and documents from prompts, files, and integrations. |
| The next analysis | Compare results to see changes and newly established details. | Document history keeps changes to the documents’ content. |
| Practical value | Material for reviewing delivered work and following up with the team. | Visual descriptions of decisions and processes. |
04
Using 1ADK and Eraser together
Use 1ADK to explore the implementation and review changes. In Eraser, prepare a document with design options or a sequence diagram showing who sends requests to whom. After implementation, the next 1ADK analysis helps you compare the findings with the agreed plan.
Questions about using 1ADK
Yes. It supports creating diagrams from files and integrations with agents. 1ADK focuses on how owners use the results over time: evidence, questions, a map, and comparisons within one project.
So you can return to a component and its supporting reference, see unanswered questions, and compare the result with a new analysis. It becomes part of the project’s history instead of a standalone response.
It provides material for review: findings, evidence, and differences between analyses. Acceptance remains a human decision; a component’s presence doesn’t prove that every scenario works correctly.
Product names and trademarks belong to their owners. 1ADK is not affiliated with these companies.
Find out what’s in your project.
The first analysis and one update are free. Your coding agent examines the project; 1ADK receives a structured description, not source files. Explore the map, check the evidence, and compare results.
No repository access. No source-code upload. No card.